Copyright

The purpose of art is to inspire, the purpose of knowledge is to educate.

Overzealous attitudes to copyrighting work turns these things into nothing more than commercial venture, and is detrimental to the advance of culture and knowledge—greed is destructive.

Greed seems to be the common motive behind the modern obsession with copyrighting of just about all work, and with extremely restrictive conditions—not just to protect it, not merely to obtain suitable reward for one's work, but to extort the maximum amount of money that's possible from selling encumbered access to it.  We are going to lose some valuable material because copyright disallows it being copied it for a long period, yet the passage time makes it uncopyable (as it deteriorates), or it's simply forgotten about.

By comparison, some of history's greatest art has inspired other artists who've partially copied it, or its style, while adding their own embellishments, because they could do so.  And this was considered a compliment to the original artist, not stealing—classical artwork and music is replete with examples of this.

Many important discoveries are found through the pooling of knowledge, and we learn by sharing what we learn, but that process is harmed by restricting the information—whether that be because of copyright, or unaffordable costs involved in purchasing copies.


Homepage, personal section, soapbox sub-section.

Contents
Main sections:
homepage
business info
personal info
contact details
video production
photography
computing
reviews
misc info
website info/help
links
index
search
Personal info
Introduction
biography
recipes
soapbox
Soapbox
Introduction
republic
voting
copyright
crap technology
compact flouros
PC keyboards
web browsers
digital TV
equal opps.
identity cards
Invasion Day
media education
Microsoft sucks
no news
open standards
piracy
simple e-mail
simple HTML
WWW morons
stupid web robots
software
spelling
anti-spam
F.O. spammers!
end telemarketing
TV shouts at me
water