S-VHS isn't the same as VHS

Although the two cassettes look virtually the same, that's about the only things they have in common (they both use half-inch wide video tape in the same-sized cassette shells).  S-VHS uses different carrier frequencies to record the luminance portion of the video signal (where all the picture detail is).  This higher carrier frequency means that almost double the picture detail than VHS is recorded, and with less noise and picture distortions.  Because of the technical differences, only specal VCRs can play S-VHS video recordings.  Also, S-VHS video tape has a different chemical formulation than VHS.

In general, S-VHS can reproduce an image with a higher quality than the average television set is capable of showing.  Compare that to VHS which always produces a picture quality worse than the worst of mediocre television sets.

We use S-VHS tapes and equipment for mastering most of our video production work, because it's more than good enough for most jobs which end up on VHS or DVD for playback.  Using greater, and more expensive, formats would be a waste of money (yours and mine).  And many of recording formats don't have the continuous recording length that we need for some jobs.  DVD is unsuitable as a mastering format, it uses heavy compression, needs re-encoding (and will usually be recompressed) if you edit it, has a delayed start-up time, isn't very robust, and has many compatibility problems.  The format used for production and mastering doesn't have to match the format used for end playback, but should be better than it.

Some “facts”


Contents
Main sections:
homepage
contact details
business info
personal info
eBay & trading
“sales” ads
“wanted” ads
electronics
video production
photography
computing
reviews
misc info
website info/help
links
index
search